Article info
Research ethics
Factors influencing the effectiveness of research ethics committees
- Correspondence to: C A Schuppli Animal Welfare Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Hall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, canada; schuppli{at}interchange.ubc.ca
Citation
Factors influencing the effectiveness of research ethics committees
Publication history
- Received November 7, 2005
- Accepted April 6, 2006
- Revised April 1, 2006
- First published April 30, 2007.
Online issue publication
April 30, 2007
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2007 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Different views on ethics: how animal ethics is situated in a committee culture
- Animal researchers shoulder a psychological burden that animal ethics committees ought to address
- Institution animal care and use committees need greater ethical diversity
- Lay community perceptions and treatment options for hypertension in rural northern Ghana: a qualitative analysis
- Community perceptions matter: a mixed-methods study using local knowledge to define features of success for a community intervention to improve quality of care for children under-5 in Jigawa, Nigeria
- How community participation in water and sanitation interventions impacts human health, WASH infrastructure and service longevity in low-income and middle-income countries: a realist review
- Involving im/migrant community members for knowledge co-creation: the greater the desired involvement, the greater the need for capacity building
- “I think people have been in survival mode”: a qualitative study of community connectivity in a neighbourhood of North East England before and during COVID-19
- Learning health systems, clinical equipoise and the ethics of response adaptive randomisation
- Quitting smoking and experience of smoking cessation interventions among UK Bangladeshi and Pakistani adults: the views of community members and health professionals