Article info
PDFResearch ethics
A qualitative study of institutional review board members’ experience reviewing research proposals using emergency exception from informed consent
- Correspondence to: Dr K McClure Department of Emergency Medicine CDW-EM, Oregon Health & Sciences University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road; Portland, OR 97239, USA; mcclurka{at}ohsu.edu
Citation
A qualitative study of institutional review board members’ experience reviewing research proposals using emergency exception from informed consent
Publication history
- Received October 27, 2005
- Accepted June 28, 2006
- Revised June 12, 2006
- First published April 30, 2007.
Online issue publication
April 30, 2007
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2007 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Developing capacity to protect human research subjects in a post-conflict, resource-constrained setting: procedures and prospects
- Variations in institutional review board processes and consent requirements for trauma research: an EAST multicenter survey
- When are clinical trials beneficial for study patients and future patients? A factorial vignette-based survey of institutional review board members
- The evaluation of the risks and benefits of phase II cancer clinical trials by institutional review board (IRB) members: a case study
- Ethics committees for biomedical research in some African emerging countries: which establishment for which independence? A comparison with the USA and Canada
- ‘Ethical responsibility’ or ‘a whole can of worms’: differences in opinion on incidental finding review and disclosure in neuroimaging research from focus group discussions with participants, parents, IRB members, investigators, physicians and community members
- Clinical Research From Proposal to Implementation
- Regulatory challenges in conducting human subjects research in emergency settings: the National Trauma Research Action Plan (NTRAP) scoping review
- How IRBs view and make decisions about coercion and undue influence
- Advancing independent adolescent consent for participation in HIV prevention research