Article info
PDFReproductive ethics
The best possible child
- Correspondence to: Professor M Parker The Ethox Centre, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Gibson Building/Block 21, Radcliffe Infirmary, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK; michael.parker{at}ethox.ox.ac.uk
Citation
The best possible child
Publication history
- Received June 23, 2006
- Accepted June 26, 2006
- Revised June 23, 2006
- First published April 30, 2007.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2007 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- In defence of Procreative Beneficence
- On the partiality of procreative beneficence: a critical note
- Genetic selection for deafness: the views of hearing children of deaf adults
- Procreative beneficence and the prospective parent
- Is procreative beneficence obligatory?
- Defending the impairment argument
- Do we need an alternative ‘relational approach’ to saviour siblings?
- Medical and bioethical considerations in elective cochlear implant array removal
- Is there a moral obligation to select healthy children?
- Deaf lesbians, “designer disability,” and the future of medicine