Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Proportional ethical review and the identification of ethical issues
Citation
Proportional ethical review and the identification of ethical issues
Publication history
- Received March 24, 2006
- Accepted May 26, 2006
- Revised May 17, 2006
- First published March 30, 2007.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2007 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Efficiency and the proposed reforms to the NHS research ethics system
- The experiences of ethics committee members: contradictions between individuals and committees
- Non-equivalent stringency of ethical review in the Baltic States: a sign of a systematic problem in Europe?
- Determining the need for ethical review: a three-stage Delphi study
- The ESRC research ethics framework and research ethics review at UK universities: rebuilding the Tower of Babel REC by REC
- Ethics review of research: in pursuit of proportionality
- Ethical approval for research involving geographically dispersed subjects: unsuitability of the UK MREC/LREC system and relevance to uncommon genetic disorders
- Can an ethics officer role reduce delays in research ethics approval? A mixed-method evaluation of an improvement project
- Human infection challenge studies in endemic settings and/or low-income and middle-income countries: key points of ethical consensus and controversy
- NHS research ethics committees