It is commonly held that respect for autonomy is one of the most important principles in medical ethics. However, there are a number of interpretations as to what that respect actually entails in practice and a number of constraints have been suggested even on our self-regarding choices. These limits are often justified in the name of autonomy. In this paper, it is argued that these different interpretations can be explained and understood by looking at the discussion from the viewpoints of positive and negative liberty and the various notions of a “person” that lay beneath. It will be shown how all the appeals to positive liberty presuppose a particular value system and are therefore problematic in multicultural societies.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: None.
This article was produced as a part of the project Ethical and Social Aspects of Bioinformatics (ESABI), financed between 2004 and 2007 by the Academy of Finland (SA 105139).
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Positive rights, negative rights and health care
- Whither a Welfare-Funded ’Sex Doula' Programme?
- Human rights and bioethics
- Redefining liberty: is natural inability a legitimate constraint of liberty?
- Is supervised community treatment ethically justifiable?
- Advance consent, critical interests and dementia research
- Reproduction misconceived: why there is no right to reproduce and the implications for ART access
- Choosing Health and the inner citadel
- The tension between self governance and absolute inner worth in Kant’s moral philosophy
- Promoting the freedom of thought of mental health service users: Nussbaum’s capabilities approach meets values-based practice