Article Text
PDFCorrection
CORRECTION
Statistics from Altmetric.com
In the paper titled, The objective structured clinical examination and student collusion: marks do not tell the whole truth (J Med Ethics 2006;32:734–9), the initial for the author Kenneth E Boyd is incorrect. It should be Kenneth M Boyd. The journal apologises for this error.
Linked Articles
- Teaching and learning ethics
Other content recommended for you
- The Objective Structured Clinical Examination and student collusion: marks do not tell the whole truth
- Order effects in high stakes undergraduate examinations: an analysis of 5 years of administrative data in one UK medical school
- How does preclinical laboratory training impact physical examination skills during the first clinical year? A retrospective analysis of routinely collected objective structured clinical examination scores among the first two matriculating classes of a reformed curriculum in one Polish medical school
- Effects of a new parallel primary healthcare centre and on-campus training programme on history taking, physical examination skills and medical students' preparedness: a prospective comparative study in Taiwan
- Objectivity in subjectivity: do students’ self and peer assessments correlate with examiners’ subjective and objective assessment in clinical skills? A prospective study
- Ability of a bovine transrectal palpation objective structured clinical examination to predict veterinary students’ pregnancy diagnosis accuracy
- Using standardised patients in an objective structured clinical examination as a patient safety tool
- Using the Many-Facet Rasch Model to analyse and evaluate the quality of objective structured clinical examination: a non-experimental cross-sectional design
- Impact on medical students of incorporating GALS screen teaching into the medical school curriculum
- Effect of a high-intensity one-week training programme and student-level variables on the bovine transrectal palpation and pregnancy diagnosis skills of final-year veterinary students