Article Text
Research ethics
Ethical reflections on Edward Jenner’s experimental treatment
Abstract
In 1798 Dr Edward Jenner published his famous account of “vaccination”. Some claim that a Research Ethics Committee, had it existed in the 1790s, might have rejected his work. I provide the historical context of his work and argue that it addressed a major risk to the health of the community, and, given the devastating nature of smallpox and the significant risk of variolation, the only alternative preventative measure, Jenner’s study had purpose, justification and a base in the practice of the day.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Competing interests: None.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- “Cotton Mather, you dog, dam you! I’l inoculate you with this; with a pox to you”: smallpox inoculation, Boston, 1721
- Anti-vaccinationists past and present
- Put Edward Jenner’s statue back in Trafalgar Square
- George Boole, saucy little Alice and an uneventful smallpox vaccination: one of the greatest stories never told
- How to hold an ethical pox party
- Making the right decision: Benjamin Franklin’s son dies of smallpox in 1736
- A vaccine scare in 19th century Northampton
- Monkeypox as an emerging infectious disease: the ophthalmic implications
- Edward Jenner's Inquiry after 200 years
- Infectious disease control in the Ionian Islands during the British Protection (1815–1864)