Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Science and Ethics inextricably intertwined
Dawson and Yentis argue that research ethics committees (RECs) have an obligation to consider the science of applications because this is inextricably entwined with ethics. They lament the fact that the recent English ministerial review of RECs suggests that science should be assessed by others for RECs and not by the committee members themselves. In fact, these views are not as incompatible as they might first appear.
The plain truth of the matter is that in a maximum membership of 18, at least a third of whom must be lay members, the capacity of each of the 186 RECs currently in the UK to review …
Competing interests: None declared.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The ESRC research ethics framework and research ethics review at UK universities: rebuilding the Tower of Babel REC by REC
- Should research ethics committees meet in public?
- Proportional ethical review and the identification of ethical issues
- Prisoners as research participants: current practice and attitudes in the UK
- The experiences of ethics committee members: contradictions between individuals and committees
- A hands-on guide on obtaining research ethics approval
- Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?
- Research involving adults who lack capacity: how have research ethics committees interpreted the requirements?
- New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants’ interest
- Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research ethics committees in low- and middle-income countries