While there are numerous doubts, controversies and lack of consensus on alternative definitions of human death, it is argued that it is more ethical to allow people to choose either cessation of cardio-respiratory function or loss of entire brain function as the definition of death based on their own views. This paper presents the law of organ transplantation in Japan, which allows people to decide whether brain death can be used to determine their death in agreement with their family. Arguably, Japan could become a unique example of individual choice in the definition of death if the law is revised to allow individuals choose definition of death independently of their family. It suggests that such an approach is one of the reasonable policy options a country can adopt for legislation on issues related to the definition of death.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Death, dying and donation: organ transplantation and the diagnosis of death
- Should individuals choose their definition of death?
- Theological reflections on donation after circulatory death: the wisdom of Paul Ramsey and Moshe Feinstein
- Organismal death, the dead-donor rule and the ethics of vital organ procurement
- The Declaration of Sydney on human death
- Defining death in non-heart beating organ donors
- Defining death: when physicians and families differ
- Depictions of ‘brain death’ in the media: medical and ethical implications
- Reply to: Defining death: when physicians and families differ
- The concept of brain death did not evolve to benefit organ transplants