Article Text
Abstract
The unique context of the rural setting provides special challenges to furnishing ethical healthcare to its approximately 62 million inhabitants. Although rural communities are widely diverse, most have the following common features: limited economic resources, shared values, reduced health status, limited availability of and accessibility to healthcare services, overlapping professional–patient relationships and care giver stress. These rural features shape common healthcare ethical issues, including threats to confidentiality, boundary issues, professional–patient relationship and allocation of resources. To date, there exists a limited focus on rural healthcare ethics shown by the scarcity of rural healthcare ethics literature, rural ethics committees, rural focused ethics training and research on rural ethics issues. An interdisciplinary group of rural healthcare ethicists with backgrounds in medicine, nursing and philosophy was convened to explore the need for a rural healthcare ethics agenda. At the meeting, the Coalition for Rural Health Care Ethics agreed to a definition of rural healthcare ethics and a broad-ranging rural ethics agenda with the ultimate goal of enhancing the quality of patient care in rural America. The proposed agenda calls for increasing awareness and understanding of rural healthcare ethics through the development of evidence—informed, rural-attuned research, scholarship and education in collaboration with rural healthcare professionals, healthcare institutions and the diverse rural population.
- ASBH, American Society of Bioethics and Humanities
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Competing interests: None.
-
Members of coalition for rural healthcare ethics: Angeline Bushy, University of Central Florida; Ann Cook, University of Montana; Jacqueline Glover, University of Colorado; William Nelson, Dartmouth Medical School; Denise Niemira, MD, Newport, VT; Andrew Pomerantz, VAMC White River Junction, VT; Dartmouth Medical School; Laura Roberts, Medical College of Wisconsin; Tom Townsend, East Tennessee State University.
The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or of the US government.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Rural and non-rural differences in membership of the American Society of Bioethics and Humanities
- Early outcomes of a rural-oriented physician education programme against rural physician shortages in Guangxi province: a prospective cohort study
- Rural family physician perspectives on communication with urban specialists: a qualitative study
- Identifying features of quality in rural placements for health students: scoping review
- Solar-powered oxygen, quality improvement and child pneumonia deaths: a large-scale effectiveness study
- Can India’s primary care facilities deliver? A cross-sectional assessment of the Indian public health system’s capacity for basic delivery and newborn services
- Benefits of the ‘village’: a qualitative exploration of the patient experience of COPD in rural Australia
- ‘History obligates us to do it’: political capabilities of Indigenous grassroots leaders of health accountability initiatives in rural Guatemala
- Addressing rural and Indigenous health inequities in Canada through socially accountable health partnerships
- Understanding the challenges to caring for low birthweight babies in rural southern Malawi: a qualitative study exploring caregiver and health worker perceptions and experiences