Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Are the GFRUP’s recommendations for withholding or withdrawing treatments in critically ill children applicable? Results of a two-year survey
- Correspondence to: R Cremer Réanimation pédiatrique, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, CHU de Lille, 59037 Lille, France;r-cremer{at}chru-lille.fr
Citation
Are the GFRUP’s recommendations for withholding or withdrawing treatments in critically ill children applicable? Results of a two-year survey
Publication history
- Received January 12, 2006
- Accepted April 24, 2006
- Revised April 21, 2006
- First published February 28, 2007.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2007 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Reliability of PRISM and PIM scores in paediatric intensive care
- Risk adjusted mortality of critical illness in a defined geographical region
- Reduction in case fatality rate from meningococcal disease associated with improved healthcare delivery
- Gastric tonometry in septic shock
- Incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a comparison of two definitions
- A comparison of three scoring systems for mortality risk among retrieved intensive care patients
- Design and rationale of the Post-Intensive Care Syndrome – paediatrics (PICS-p) Longitudinal Cohort Study
- Angiotensin for septic shock unresponsive to noradrenaline
- Quantifying variation of paediatric length of stay among intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand
- Mortality in severe meningococcal disease