Objective: To evaluate feasibility of the guidelines of the Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et Urgence Pédiatriques (French-speaking group of paediatric intensive and emergency care; GFRUP) for limitation of treatments in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU).
Design: A 2-year prospective survey.
Setting: A 12-bed PICU at the Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Lille, France.
Patients: Were included when limitation of treatments was expected.
Results: Of 967 children admitted, 55 were included with a 2-day median delay. They were younger than others (24 v 60 months), had a higher paediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) score (14 v 4), and a higher paediatric overall performance category (POPC) score at admission (2 v 1); all p<0.002. 34 (50% of total deaths) children died. A limitation decision was made without meeting for 7 children who died: 6 received do-not-resuscitate orders (DNROs) and 1 received withholding decision. Decision-making meetings were organised for 31 children, and the following decisions were made: 12 DNROs (6 deaths and 6 survivals), 4 withholding (1 death and 3 survivals), with 14 withdrawing (14 deaths) and 1 continuing treatment (survival). After limitation, 21 (31% of total deaths) children died and 10 survived (POPC score 4). 13 procedures were interrupted because of death and 11 because of clinical improvement (POPC score 4). Parents’ opinions were obtained after 4 family conferences (for a total of 110 min), 3 days after inclusion. The first meeting was planned for 6 days after inclusion and held on the 7th day after inclusion; 80% of parents were immediately informed of the decision, which was implemented after half a day.
Conclusions: GFRUPs procedure was applicable in most cases. The main difficulties were anticipating the correct date for the meeting and involving nurses in the procedure. Children for whom the procedure was interrupted because of clinical improvement and who survived in poor condition without a formal decision pointed out the need for medical criteria for questioning, which should systematically lead to a formal decision-making process.
- DRNO, do-not-resuscitate order
- GFRUP, Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et Urgence Pédiatriques (French-speaking group of paediatric intensive and emergency care)
- PICU, paediatric intensive care unit
- POPC, paediatric overall performance category
- PRISM, paediatric risk of mortality
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: None declared.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Reliability of PRISM and PIM scores in paediatric intensive care
- Risk adjusted mortality of critical illness in a defined geographical region
- Reduction in case fatality rate from meningococcal disease associated with improved healthcare delivery
- Gastric tonometry in septic shock
- Incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a comparison of two definitions
- A comparison of three scoring systems for mortality risk among retrieved intensive care patients
- Angiotensin for septic shock unresponsive to noradrenaline
- Quantifying variation of paediatric length of stay among intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand
- Mortality in severe meningococcal disease
- Procalcitonin as a prognostic marker in children with meningococcal septic shock