Article info
Research ethics
Assessment of the ethical review process for non-pharmacological multicentre studies in Germany on the basis of a randomised surgical trial
- Correspondence to: C M Seiler Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110,D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany; christoph_seiler{at}med.uni-heidelberg.de
Citation
Assessment of the ethical review process for non-pharmacological multicentre studies in Germany on the basis of a randomised surgical trial
Publication history
- Received September 30, 2005
- Accepted March 30, 2006
- Revised March 28, 2006
- First published January 30, 2007.
Online issue publication
January 30, 2007
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2007 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Research ethics committees: the role of ethics in a regulatory authority
- Composition, training needs and independence of ethics review committees across Africa: are the gate-keepers rising to the emerging challenges?
- Problems and development strategies for research ethics committees in China’s higher education institutions
- Nature and governance of veterinary clinical research conducted in the UK
- How are adults with capacity-affecting conditions and associated communication difficulties included in ethically sound research? A documentary-based survey of ethical review and recruitment processes under the research provisions of the Mental Capacity Act (2005) for England and Wales
- In the lion's den? Experiences of interaction with research ethics committees
- Approaches to governance of participant-led research: a qualitative case study
- Ethics committees and the legality of research
- Implementation of the process of ethical review of improvement activities at the Children's Hospital at Westmead
- Ethics bureaucracy: a significant hurdle for collaborative follow-up of drug effectiveness in rare childhood diseases