Healthcare package decisions are complex. Different judgements about effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and disease burden influence the decision-making process. Moreover, different concepts of justice generate different ideas about fair distribution of healthcare resources. This paper presents a decision model that is used in medical school in order to familiarise medical students with the different concepts of justice and the ethical dimension of making concrete choices. The model is based on the four-stage decision model developed in the Netherlands by the Dunning Committee and the discussion that followed its presentation in 1991. Having to deal with 10 medical services, students working with the model learn to discern and integrate four different ideas of distributive justice that are integrated in a flow chart: libertarian, communitarian, egalitarian and utilitarian.
- healthcare package
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: None.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Genetic information, insurance and a pluralistic approach to justice
- Where is knowledge from the global South? An account of epistemic justice for a global bioethics
- Research for Health Justice: an ethical framework linking global health research to health equity
- A comparison of justice frameworks for international research
- Improving responses to safety incidents: we need to talk about justice
- Genetic information, discrimination, philosophical pluralism and politics
- Can antibiotic use be both just and sustainable… or only more or less so?
- Personal responsibility for health as a rationing criterion: why we don’t like it and why maybe we should
- Distributive justice and the harm to medical professionals fighting epidemics
- Health-related quality of life and well-being in people over 75 years of age with end-stage kidney disease managed with dialysis or comprehensive conservative care: a cross-sectional study in the UK and Australia