Article Text
Abstract
One role of research ethics committees (RECs) is to assess the ethics of proposed health research. In some countries, RECs are also instructed to assess its legality. However, in other countries they are explicitly instructed not to do so. In this paper, I defend the claim that public policy should instruct RECs not to assess the legality of proposed research (“the Claim”). I initially defend a presumption in favour of the Claim, citing reasons for making research institutions solely responsible for assessing the legality of their own research. I then consider three arguments against the Claim which may over-ride this presumption—namely, that policy should instruct RECs to assess the legality of research because (1) doing so would minimise the costs of assessing the legality of research, (2) whether research is legal may partly determine whether it is ethical and (3) whether research is legal may constitute evidence for whether it is ethical. I reject the first two arguments and note that whether the third succeeds depends on the answer to a more fundamental question about the appropriate nature of REC ethical deliberation. I end with a brief discussion of this question, tentatively concluding that the third argument also fails.
- research ethics committees
- ethical review
- legislation & jurisprudence
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding: Wellcome Trust, New Zealand Ministry of Health (external contract). The views contained in the paper are the views of the author only.
Competing interests: None.
- Abbreviation:
- REC
- research ethic committee
Linked Articles
Other content recommended for you
- The cultural specifity of research ethics—or why ethical debate in France is different
- Problems and development strategies for research ethics committees in China’s higher education institutions
- Implementation of the EU clinical trial regulation transforms the ethics committee systems and endangers ethical standards
- The job of ‘ethics committees’
- A qualitative study of institutional review board members’ experience reviewing research proposals using emergency exception from informed consent
- Legislative regulation and ethical governance of medical research in different European Union countries
- Ethics in systematic reviews
- Human-tissue-related inventions: ownership and intellectual property rights in international collaborative research in developing countries
- Health policy and systems research: towards a better understanding and review of ethical issues
- What is the role of the research ethics committee? Paternalism, inducements, and harm in research ethics