Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
In December 2006, the International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR)—a scientific membership organisation for stem cell scientists, laboratories and biotechnology companies—released its Guidelines for the conduct of human embryonic stem cell research (hereafter the ISSCR Guidelines).1 One of the ethically controversial issues addressed therein is financial compensation for women who provide eggs used to create research embryos for stem cell science. Significantly, this issue is one of the few on which authors of the ISSCR Guidelines did not readily agree.2 Some argued that altruism alone should motivate women to provide eggs for research and that even reimbursement of direct expenses could result in abuse. Others insisted that it would be both unfair and exploitative to have women …
Footnotes
Françoise Baylis, PhD, FRSC, is a member of the Board of Directors of Assisted Human Reproduction Canada. The views expressed herein are her own.
Research funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Competing interests: None declared.
↵i Examples of these guidelines and laws are the National Research Council guidelines3 and laws in Massachusetts, Connecticut, Indiana, Maryland,4 California,5 France,6 South Korea7 and Canada.8
↵ii Human cloning involves the insertion of nuclear DNA from a human somatic cell into an enucleated human egg, which is then activated so that it starts dividing, becoming an embryo from which stem cell lines can be derived.
↵iii For obvious reasons, we follow the ISSCR Guidelines in using the term “providers” rather than “donors” when there is payment involved.
↵iiii To be clear, with a system of altruistic donation that permits reimbursement for direct, receipted expenses (including such things as travel, accommodation and childcare and excluding such things as inconvenience, time, pain and discomfort), any inducement that might occur would not be undue. Such inducement would simply aim to ensure that a woman’s altruistic decision to provide eggs for research did not result in personal financial loss.
- Abbreviations:
- HFEA
- Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority
- ISSCR
- International Society for Stem Cell Research
- IVF
- in vitro fertilisation
- MRC
- Medical Research Council
- OHSS
- ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome
- SCRO
- Stem Cell Research Oversight
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Observational retrospective study of UK national success, risks and costs for 319,105 IVF/ICSI and 30,669 IUI treatment cycles
- Ethics briefing
- Research ethics and lessons from Hwanggate: what can we learn from the Korean cloning fraud?
- Correlation of IVF outcomes and number of oocytes retrieved: a UK retrospective longitudinal observational study of 172 341 non-donor cycles
- A brief and personal history of ‘what’s in a name’ in reproductive genetics
- Creating and sacrificing embryos for stem cells
- Assisted conception. II—In vitro fertilisation and intracytoplasmic sperm injection
- Differences between sperm sharing and egg sharing are morally relevant
- The need for donor consent in mitochondrial replacement
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles