Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Non-human primates: the appropriate subjects of biomedical research?
Citation
Non-human primates: the appropriate subjects of biomedical research?
Publication history
- First published October 30, 2007.
Online issue publication
February 10, 2017
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2007 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- The ethical justification for the use of non-human primates in research: the Weatherall report revisited
- Objections still fail: a response to Faria
- A flimsy case for the use of non-human primates in research: a reply to Arnason
- Is there a place for animal experiments?
- Parkinson’s disease and primate research: past, present, and future
- Non-equivalent stringency of ethical review in the Baltic States: a sign of a systematic problem in Europe?
- Biodefence and the production of knowledge: rethinking the problem
- Spontaneous, naturally occurring cancers in non-human primates as a translational model for cancer immunotherapy
- Report backs research on non-human primates but demands closer scrutiny
- Alternatives to animal experimentation