Article Text
PDF
Abstract
Significant changes are proposed for the research ethics system governing the review of the conduct of medical research in the UK. This paper examines these changes and whether they will meet the aimed-for goal of improving the efficiency of the research ethics system. The author concludes that, unfortunately, they will not and thus should be rejected.
- research ethics
- NHS research ethics system
- proportional review
- efficiency
- research ethics committees
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
i There is an apparent discrepancy here between the figure I gave earlier of 30 days’ average turnaround time for an application and the figure quoted in the implementation plan of 40 days. This is because COREC has changed how it counts its turnaround time. The figure I give is based on the interval between receipt to decision. The figure in the implementation plan extends the interval to the applicant’s receipt of the decision letter. I have stuck with the figure of 30 days throughout, because COREC has provided full management information, using the old variable as part of the consultation plan.
Competing interests: David Hunter at present sits on one of the ORECNI Research Ethics Committees. He also sits on the University of Ulster Research Ethics Committee.
- Abbreviations:
- COREC
- Central Office for Research Ethics Committees
- NHS
- National Health Service
- NREA
- national research ethics advisor
- REC
- research ethics committee
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Proportional ethical review and the identification of ethical issues
- The experiences of ethics committee members: contradictions between individuals and committees
- The ESRC research ethics framework and research ethics review at UK universities: rebuilding the Tower of Babel REC by REC
- Beyond regulatory approaches to ethics: making space for ethical preparedness in healthcare research
- The reform of UK research ethics committees: throwing the baby out with the bath water?
- Ethics review of research: in pursuit of proportionality
- Ethical approval for research involving geographically dispersed subjects: unsuitability of the UK MREC/LREC system and relevance to uncommon genetic disorders
- New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants’ interest
- Research involving adults who lack capacity: how have research ethics committees interpreted the requirements?
- In the lion's den? Experiences of interaction with research ethics committees