Article Text
Abstract
This paper argues that the new commercial and quasi-commercial activities of medicine, scientists, pharmaceutical companies and industry with regard to human tissue has given rise to a whole new way of valuing our bodies. It is argued that a property framework may be an effective and constructive method of exploring issues arising from this. The paper refers to A M Honoré’s theory of ownership and aims to show that we have full liberal ownership of our own bodies and as such can be considered to be self-owners.
- property
- body
- self-ownership
- Honoré
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
↵i Moore v Regents of the University of California 793 P 2d (Cal, 1990) is a good example of how advancing biotechnology and the commercial activities surrounding such technology can lead to concerns over the control and ownership of human tissue.
↵ii Note that this is an Anglo-American/Western European conception of property and the body.
↵iii This was not explicit in the original text but was suggested by Richard Flathman.4
↵iv Honoré admits that the reason for this may merely be a deficiency in legal linguistics, as the body is not an “external material object”; however, he declares that it is more likely to be because “it has been thought undesirable that a person should alienate his body” (p 180).1
↵v As Steiner astutely puts it “it’s not that slaves have few rights: they have none”. (p 231)2
Competing interests: None
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Body parts in property theory: an integrated framework
- Human-tissue-related inventions: ownership and intellectual property rights in international collaborative research in developing countries
- Organs as inheritable property?
- The ownership that wasn't meant to be: Yearworth and property rights in human tissue
- Bodily rights and property rights
- The human body as property? Possession, control and commodification
- Intellectual property rights and detached human body parts
- Lost property? Legal compensation for destroyed sperm: a reflection and comparison drawing on UK and French perspectives
- Is the commercialisation of human tissue and body material forbidden in the countries of the European Union?
- The argument for property rights in body parts: scarcity of resources