Article Text
Abstract
The principle of “equivalence of care” in prison medicine is a principle by which prison health services are obliged to provide prisoners with care of a quality equivalent to that provided for the general public in the same country. It is cited in numerous national and international directives and recommendations.
The principle of equivalence is extremely relevant from the point of view of normative ethics but requires adaptation from the point of view of applied ethics. From a clinical point of view, the principle of equivalence is often insufficient to take account of the adaptations necessary for the organization of care in a correctional setting. The principle of equivalence is cost-effective in general, but has to be overstepped to ensure the humane management of certain special cases.
- equivalence of care
- prison medicine
- ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests: None declared.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- ‘Equivalence of care’ in prison medicine: is equivalence of process the right measure of equity?
- Examining the role of healthcare professionals in the use of solitary confinement
- Prison health services
- Mapping palliative care provision in European prisons: an EAPC Task Force Survey
- How do policymakers interpret and implement the principle of equivalence with regard to prison health? A qualitative study among key policymakers in England
- Rates of opioid agonist treatment prescribing in provincial prisons in Ontario, Canada, 2015–2018: a repeated cross-sectional analysis
- Palliative and end of life care in prisons: a mixed-methods rapid review of the literature from 2014–2018
- Rethinking standards on prison cell size in a (post)pandemic world: a scoping review
- How to run a prison sexually transmitted infection service
- Pitfalls of tuberculosis programmes in prisons