Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
The Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (UDBHR) was developed through multinational consultation over several years. It was officially adopted by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (Unesco) in October 2005.1 This paper explores the process of drafting the UDBHR, critically analyses its content and considers its status in the context of global bioethics. It comments on the UDBHR’s failure to acknowledge or respond to socioeconomic and other factors that impede attempts to implement it. The paper concludes that the process of drafting the declaration excluded a necessary group of stakeholders and that the UDBHR therefore fails to provide the guidance it aims to offer.
Identifying a need to develop universally applicable ethical guidelines within a context of cultural pluralism, Unesco began developing a draft Declaration on Universal Norms on Bioethics. A near final draft was posted on Unesco’s website in February 2005 and replaced in June 2005 with the version subsequently adopted as the UDBHR. Stakeholder consultation on the draft involved hundreds of people in many diverse nations. These were seemingly limited to consultations with Unesco affiliates, however, and public comment was not solicited. …
Footnotes
Competing interests: None.
- Abbreviations:
- IBC
- International Bioethics Committee
- UDBHR
- Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
- Unesco
- United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Global bioethics at UNESCO: in defence of the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
- Will international human rights subsume medical ethics? Intersections in the UNESCO Universal Bioethics Declaration
- Unesco’s Ethics Education Programme
- UNESCO Global Ethics Observatory: database on ethics related legislation and guidelines
- Unesco’s Global Ethics Observatory
- Intercultural global bioethics
- Whose dignity? Resolving ambiguities in the scope of “human dignity” in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- Theoretical resources for a globalised bioethics
- Some barriers to knowledge from the global south: commentary to Pratt and de Vries