The wish to extend the human lifespan has a long tradition in many cultures. Optimistic views of the possibility of achieving this goal through the latest developments in medicine feature increasingly in serious scientific and philosophical discussion. The authors of this paper argue that research with the explicit aim of extending the human lifespan is both undesirable and morally unacceptable. They present three serious objections, relating to justice, the community and the meaning of life.
- life extension
- meaning of life
- global justice
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: None.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Human enhancement and perfection
- Life extension and the burden of mortality: Leon Kass versus John Harris
- Bioethics and imagination: towards a narrative bioethics committed to social action and justice
- Human embryonic stem cell research debates: a Confucian argument
- How should doctors approach patients? A Confucian reflection on personhood
- Overlap of premature birth and permissible abortion
- African perspectives of moral status: a framework for evaluating global bioethical issues
- Whose dignity? Resolving ambiguities in the scope of “human dignity” in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
- Should we enhance animals?
- Commodification and exploitation: arguments in favour of compensated organ donation