Article Text
Abstract
Coercion and pressure in mental healthcare raise moral questions. This article focuses on moral questions raised by the everyday practice of pressure and coercion in the care for the mentally ill. In view of an example from literature—the story of Ulysses and the Sirens—several ethical issues surrounding this practice of care are discussed. Care giver and patient should be able to express feelings such as frustration, fear and powerlessness, and attention must be paid to those feelings. In order to be able to evaluate the intervention, one has to be aware of the variety of goals the intervention can aim at. One also has to be aware of the variety of methods of intervention, each with its own benefits and drawbacks. Finally, an intervention requires a context of care and responsibility, along with good communication and fair treatment before, during and after the use of coercion and pressure.
- ethics
- coercive treatment
- pressure
- mental illness
- Ulysses
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests: None declared
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Pressure and coercion in the care for the addicted: ethical perspectives
- Ethics of deliberation, consent and coercion in psychiatry
- Patient-controlled hospital admission for patients with severe mental disorders: study protocol for a nationwide prospective multicentre study
- Seclusion and its context in acute inpatient psychiatric care
- Redefining liberty: is natural inability a legitimate constraint of liberty?
- Tuberculosis, non-compliance and detention for the public health
- Using coercion in mental disorders or risking the patient’s death? An analysis of the protocols of a clinical ethics committee and a derived decision algorithm
- The ethics of coercion in mental healthcare: the role of structural racism
- Good reasons to vaccinate: mandatory or payment for risk?
- Is supervised community treatment ethically justifiable?