In this paper several reasons as to why framing issues should be of greater interest to both medical ethicists and healthcare professionals are suggested: firstly, framing can help in explaining health behaviours that can, from the medical perspective, appear perverse; secondly, framing provides a way of describing the internal structure of ethical arguments; and thirdly, an understanding of framing issues can help in identifying clinical practices, such as non-directive counselling, which may, inadvertently, be failing to meet their own stated ethical aims. The effect of framing on how individuals interpret information and how healthcare choices are influenced by framing are described. Next, the role of framing in ethical discourse is discussed with specific reference to Judith Jarvis Thomson’s philosophical mind experiment about abortion and the violinist. Finally, the implications of this analysis are examined for the practice of non-directive counselling, which aims at communicating information in a neutral, value-free way and thereby protecting patient autonomy.
- ARR, absolute relative risk
- MMR, measles, mumps and rubella
- RRR, relative risk reduction
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: None.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- MMR vaccine - how effective and how safe?
- Measles vaccination and antibody response in autism spectrum disorders
- MMR: marginalised, misrepresented and rejected? Autism: a focus group study
- Measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination and bowel problems or developmental regression in children with autism: population study
- MMR: where are we now?
- MMR vaccine—worries are not justified
- Effects of a web based decision aid on parental attitudes to MMR vaccination: a before and after study
- Improving MMR vaccination rates: herd immunity is a realistic goal
- Protecting people with multiple sclerosis through vaccination
- Effect of Pentavac and measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination on the intestine