Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Should research ethics committees be told how to think?
- Correspondence to: Dr Gwen M Sayers Department of General and Geriatric Medicine, Northwick Park Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex HA1 3UJ, UK; gwen.sayers{at}imperial.ac.uk
Citation
Should research ethics committees be told how to think?
Publication history
- Received October 9, 2005
- Accepted March 2, 2006
- Revised February 27, 2006
- First published January 5, 2007.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2007 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Research ethics committees in Europe: implementing the directive, respecting diversity
- An analysis of decision letters by research ethics committees: the ethics/scientific quality boundary examined
- Is the NHS research ethics committees system to be outsourced to a low-cost offshore call centre? Reflections on human research ethics after the Warner Report
- Evaluation of the work of hospital districts’ research ethics committees in Finland
- Research ethics committees: the role of ethics in a regulatory authority
- Contesting the science/ethics distinction in the review of clinical research
- Another threat to research in the United Kingdom
- Problems and development strategies for research ethics committees in China’s higher education institutions
- Proportional ethical review and the identification of ethical issues
- NHS research ethics committees