In 2002, a child was abandoned in a Burger King restaurant in Amsterdam by a Chinese woman, who hoped that the baby would be picked up by someone able to give the child a better life. She was convicted for child abandonment and imprisoned. Whereas some forms of child abandonment are criminalised, others are socially accepted and not even on the ethics agenda. This paper is an invitation to reflect on the inconsistency in the ways in which we prosecute, punish or try to correct some forms of child abandonment and yet make allowances for others.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: None.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- On triparenting. Is having three committed parents better than having only two?
- Artificial gametes and the ethics of unwitting parenthood
- Willing mothers: ectogenesis and the role of gestational motherhood
- Does egg donation for mitochondrial replacement techniques generate parental responsibilities?
- So not mothers: responsibility for surrogate orphans
- Fatherlessness, sperm donors and ‘so what?’ parentage: arguing against the immorality of donor conception through ‘world literature’
- Parent-initiated posthumous-assisted reproduction revisited in light of the interest in genetic origins
- Interpretations, perspectives and intentions in surrogate motherhood
- What makes a parent? It’s not black or white
- Consent agreements for cryopreserved embryos: the case for choice