Article info
PDFReproduction
Culpability and blame after pregnancy loss
- Correspondence to: B Hale Philosophy Department, Campus Box 232, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0232, USA; bhale{at}colorado.edu
Citation
Culpability and blame after pregnancy loss
Publication history
- Received December 13, 2005
- Accepted February 28, 2006
- Revised February 25, 2006
- First published January 5, 2007.
Online issue publication
January 05, 2007
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2007 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Abortion and regret
- Breastfeeding and defeasible duties to benefit
- Parents who wish no further treatment for their child
- The ambiguous nature of epigenetic responsibility
- Altruistic surrogacy: the necessary objectification of surrogate mothers
- Navigating moral distress using the moral distress map
- Obedient mothers, healthy children: communication on the risks of reproduction in state-socialist Czechoslovakia
- Moral and exhausting distress working in the frontline of COVID-19: a Swedish survey during the first wave in four healthcare settings
- Should we talk about the ‘benefits’ of breastfeeding? The significance of the default in representations of infant feeding
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility