Article info
PDFGeneral ethics
High hopes and automatic escalators: a critique of some new arguments in bioethics
- Correspondence to: Prof S Holm Cardiff Law School, Cardiff University, PO Box 427, Cardiff, UK; holms{at}cardiff.ac.uk
Citation
High hopes and automatic escalators: a critique of some new arguments in bioethics
Publication history
- Received February 23, 2006
- Accepted March 2, 2006
- Revised February 23, 2006
- First published January 5, 2007.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2007 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Transhumanism, medical technology and slippery slopes
- Fallacies in the arguments for new technology: the case of proton therapy
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- Should selecting saviour siblings be banned?
- Embryonic stem cell research is not dehumanising us
- Social determinants of health and slippery slopes in assisted dying debates: lessons from Canada
- Just diagnosis? Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and injustices to disabled people
- The inference from a single case: moral versus scientific inferences in implementing new biotechnologies
- Moral uncertainty and the farming of human-pig chimeras
- Preventive detention must be resisted by the medical profession