Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Should desperate volunteers be included in randomised controlled trials?
- Correspondence to: P Allmark University of Sheffield, Samuel Fox House, Northern General Hospital, Herries Road, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK; p.j.allmark{at}shef.ac.uk
Citation
Should desperate volunteers be included in randomised controlled trials?
Publication history
- Received September 5, 2005
- Accepted December 28, 2005
- Revised December 21, 2005
- First published August 30, 2006.
Online issue publication
August 30, 2006
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2006 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Randomisation in trials: do potential trial participants understand it and find it acceptable?
- Randomised placebo-controlled trials of surgery: ethical analysis and guidelines
- Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
- Are antipsychotic drugs the right treatment for challenging behaviour in learning disability?: The place of a randomised trial
- Refuting the net risks test: a response to Wendler and Miller’s “Assessing research risks systematically”
- The best is the enemy of the good - can research ethics learn from rationing?
- Attitudes towards clinical research among cancer trial participants and non-participants: an interview study using a Grounded Theory approach
- Distinguishing treatment from research: a functional approach
- Understanding, interests and informed consent: a reply to Sreenivasan
- Is providing elective ventilation in the best interests of potential donors?