Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Why the Kantian ideal survives medical learning curves, and why it matters
- Correspondence to: Dr Bob Brecher School of Historical & Critical Studies, University of Brighton, 10–11 Pavilion parade, Brighton BN2 1RA, UK; r.brecher{at}bton.ac.uk
Citation
Why the Kantian ideal survives medical learning curves, and why it matters
Publication history
- Received October 11, 2005
- Accepted November 8, 2005
- Revised November 2, 2005
- First published August 30, 2006.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2006 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Medical learning curves and the Kantian ideal
- In defence of Kant’s moral prohibition on suicide solely to avoid suffering
- Kant, curves and medical learning practice: a reply to Le Morvan and Stock
- Prescribing cannabis: freedom, autonomy, and values
- Killing people: what Kant could have said about suicide and euthanasia but did not
- Ideals of patient autonomy in clinical decision making: a study on the development of a scale to assess patients’ and physicians’ views
- A Kantian argument against comparatively advantageous genetic modification
- Kant on euthanasia and the duty to die: clearing the air
- Going high and low: on pluralism and neutrality in human embryology policy-making
- Medicating the mind: a Kantian analysis of overprescribing psychoactive drugs