The “Kantian ideal” is often misunderstood as invoking individual autonomy rather than rational self legislation. Le Morvan and Stock’s otherwise insightful discussion of “Medical learning curves and the Kantian ideal”—for example—draws the mistaken inference that that ideal is inconsistent with the realities of medical practice. But it is not. Rationally to be a patient entails accepting its necessary conditions.
- liberal individual
- rational person
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
↵i For an extended general discussion of autonomy and how Kant’s notion of it is misrepresented in discussions of health care, see Secker B.4 My thanks to one of this journal’s reviewers for directing me to this excellent discussion. Secker does not, however, share my optimism about using Kant’s own approach in healthcare ethics (Secker,4 pp 52–6).
↵ii For a more extended discussion see Neumann (Neumann3 pp 290–2).
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Medical learning curves and the Kantian ideal
- In defence of Kant’s moral prohibition on suicide solely to avoid suffering
- Kant, curves and medical learning practice: a reply to Le Morvan and Stock
- Prescribing cannabis: freedom, autonomy, and values
- Killing people: what Kant could have said about suicide and euthanasia but did not
- Ideals of patient autonomy in clinical decision making: a study on the development of a scale to assess patients’ and physicians’ views
- A Kantian argument against comparatively advantageous genetic modification
- Kant on euthanasia and the duty to die: clearing the air
- Going high and low: on pluralism and neutrality in human embryology policy-making
- Medicating the mind: a Kantian analysis of overprescribing psychoactive drugs