Article Text
PDF
Abstract
With the recent Clinical Trials Directive, a degree of harmonisation into research ethics committees (RECs) across Europe, including the time taken to assess a trial proposal and the kinds of issues a committee should take into account, has been introduced by the European Union (EU). How four different member states—Hungary, Portugal, Sweden and the UK—have chosen to implement the directive is shown. Although this has resulted in four very different ways of structuring RECs, similar themes are present in all four cases, such as centralisation of control over RECs within member states, harmonisation of REC procedures across the EU and increased role of political decision making with regard to such committees.
- CES, Comissões de Ética para Saúde
- CEIC, Comissão de Ética para a Investigação Clinica
- EU, European Union
- GYAB, Committee for Application of remedies
- IKEB, Institutional Ethics Committee
- KEOB, Research Ethics Medical Committee
- KFAB, Clinico-Pharmacology Subcommittee
- KFEB, Clinico-Pharmacological Ethics Committee
- MFR, Swedish Medical Research Council
- OGYI, National Institute of Pharmacology
- REC, research ethics committee
- UKECA, UK Ethics Committee Authority
Statistics from Altmetric.com
- CES, Comissões de Ética para Saúde
- CEIC, Comissão de Ética para a Investigação Clinica
- EU, European Union
- GYAB, Committee for Application of remedies
- IKEB, Institutional Ethics Committee
- KEOB, Research Ethics Medical Committee
- KFAB, Clinico-Pharmacology Subcommittee
- KFEB, Clinico-Pharmacological Ethics Committee
- MFR, Swedish Medical Research Council
- OGYI, National Institute of Pharmacology
- REC, research ethics committee
- UKECA, UK Ethics Committee Authority
Footnotes
-
Competing interests: None.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Legislative regulation and ethical governance of medical research in different European Union countries
- What are local issues? The problem of the local review of research
- New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants’ interest
- Is the NHS research ethics committees system to be outsourced to a low-cost offshore call centre? Reflections on human research ethics after the Warner Report
- Implementation of the EU clinical trial regulation transforms the ethics committee systems and endangers ethical standards
- The experiences of ethics committee members: contradictions between individuals and committees
- Should research ethics committees be told how to think?
- The ESRC research ethics framework and research ethics review at UK universities: rebuilding the Tower of Babel REC by REC
- Multicentre trials review process by research ethics committees in Spain: where do they stand before implementing the new European regulation?
- Gender equality in the work of local research ethics committees in Europe: a study of practice in five countries