Although the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors has published clear guidance on the authorship of scientific papers, short-term contract research workers, who perform much of the research that is reported in the biomedical literature, are often at a disadvantage in terms of recognition, reward and career progression. This article identifies several professional, ethical and operational issues associated with the assignment of authorship, describes how a university department of primary care set about identifying and responding to the concerns of its contract research staff on authorship and describes a set of guidelines that were produced to deal with the ethical and professional issues raised. These guidelines include directions on how authorship should be negotiated and allocated and how short-term researchers can begin to develop as authors. They also deal with the structures required to support an equitable system, which deals with the needs of short-term researchers in ways that are realistic in the increasingly competitive world of research funding and publication, and may offer a model for more formal guidelines that could form part of institutional research policy.
- ICMJE, International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
- RAE, Research Assessment Exercise
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: None declared.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Awareness, usage and perceptions of authorship guidelines: an international survey of biomedical authors
- Honorary authorship in postgraduate medical training
- Perceptions of authorship criteria: effects of student instruction and scientific experience
- Have ignorance and abuse of authorship criteria decreased over the past 15 years?
- Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey
- Authorship ignorance: views of researchers in French clinical settings
- Thinker, Soldier, Scribe: cross-sectional study of researchers' roles and author order in the Annals of Internal Medicine
- Honorary and ghost authorship
- Using scientific authorship criteria as a tool for equitable inclusion in global health research
- Publication ethics and the research assessment exercise: reflections on the troubled question of authorship