Article info
PDFComment
NICE is not cost effective
- Correspondence to: John Harris The Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, Institute of Medicine Law and Bioethics, School of Law, University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 0JH, UK; john.m.harris{at}man.ac.uk
Citation
NICE is not cost effective
Publication history
- First published June 30, 2006.
Online issue publication
June 30, 2006
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2006 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Wickedness or folly? The ethics of NICE’s decisions
- Nice and not so nice
- Not a NICE fallacy: a reply to Dr Quigley
- Rights, responsibilities and NICE: a rejoinder to Harris
- It’s not NICE to discriminate
- Ageism and equality
- Value based pricing for NHS drugs: an opportunity not to be missed?
- NICE is dead; long live NICE
- NICE’s new methods: putting innovation first, but at what cost?
- Does NICE apply the rule of rescue in its approach to highly specialised technologies?