Article info
PDFComment
Wickedness or folly? The ethics of NICE’s decisions
- Correspondence to: A J Culyer Institute for Work & Health, 481 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1T4; aculyer{at}iwh.on.ca
Citation
Wickedness or folly? The ethics of NICE’s decisions
Publication history
- Received February 6, 2005
- Accepted March 28, 2006
- First published June 30, 2006.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2006 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Rights, responsibilities and NICE: a rejoinder to Harris
- Not a NICE fallacy: a reply to Dr Quigley
- Justice and the NICE approach
- Ageism and equality
- A NICE fallacy
- The use of cost-effectiveness by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE): no(t yet an) exemplar of a deliberative process
- All health is not equal: the use of modifiers in NICE technology appraisal
- NICE's cost effectiveness threshold
- Economics and ethics in health care
- QALYs, euthanasia and the puzzle of death