A rebuttal is provided to each of the arguments adduced by John Harris, an Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Medical Ethics, in two editorials in the journal in support of the view that National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence’s procedures and methods for making recommendations about healthcare procedures for use in the National Health Service in England and Wales are the product of “wickedness or folly or more likely both”, “ethically illiterate as well as socially divisive”, responsible for the “perversion of science as well as of morality” and are “contrary to basic morality and contrary to human rights”.
- NHS, National Health Service
- NICE, National Institute for Clinical Excellence
- QALY, quality-adjusted life year
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
↵i Harris somewhat disingenuously claims that this charge does not apply to those people who make NICE’s recommendations, but to their “ways of thinking”, regarding which his offensive charge was really an invitation to offer alternatives. The editorials are littered with other personally abusive charges, including one of hypocrisy.
Competing interests: KC is a member of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) Appraisals Committee and was a member of the working party which recommended NICE’s current methodology for the conduct of economic appraisals. AJC was a member of the NICE Board, which commissioned and accepted this work and, although no longer on the Board, he remains a member of NICE’s Research and Development Committee.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Rights, responsibilities and NICE: a rejoinder to Harris
- Not a NICE fallacy: a reply to Dr Quigley
- Justice and the NICE approach
- Ageism and equality
- A NICE fallacy
- The use of cost-effectiveness by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE): no(t yet an) exemplar of a deliberative process
- NICE's cost effectiveness threshold
- All health is not equal: the use of modifiers in NICE technology appraisal
- Economics and ethics in health care
- QALYs, euthanasia and the puzzle of death