Article info
PDFReproductive ethics
The rhythm method and embryonic death
- Correspondence to: L Bovens London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Philosophy, Logic, and Scientific Method, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK; L.Bovens{at}lse.ac.uk
Citation
The rhythm method and embryonic death
Publication history
- Received August 9, 2005
- Accepted August 11, 2005
- First published May 26, 2006.
Online issue publication
May 26, 2006
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2006 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Embryonic viability, parental care and the pro-life thesis: a defence of Bovens
- Ageing gametes and embryonic death: a response to Bovens
- Pregravid contraceptive use and fecundability: prospective cohort study
- Prolife hypocrisy: why inconsistency arguments do not matter
- The Standard Days Method®: an addition to the arsenal of family planning method choice in Ethiopia
- Changes in the prevalence and profile of users of contraception in Britain 2000–2010: evidence from two National Surveys of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles
- Telephone or integrated contraception counselling before abortion: impact on method choice and receipt
- Pattern of contraceptive use, determinants and fertility intentions among tribal women in Kerala, India: a cross-sectional study
- Risk factors and clinical features of ovarian pregnancy: a case–control study
- Use of contraceptives and uptake of long-acting reversible contraception among postpartum women in rural China