Article info
PDFLaw, ethics and medicine
Arguing about physician-assisted suicide: a response to Steinbock
- Correspondence to: John Coggon Postgraduate Research Office, Cardiff Law School, Museum Avenue, Cardiff, CF10 3XJ, UK; coggonj{at}cf.ac.uk
Citation
Arguing about physician-assisted suicide: a response to Steinbock
Publication history
- Received June 23, 2005
- Accepted September 9, 2005
- Revised June 23, 2005
- First published May 26, 2006.
Online issue publication
May 26, 2006
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2006 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- The case for physician assisted suicide: not (yet) proven
- The case for physician assisted suicide: how can it possibly be proven?
- Organ donation after medical assistance in dying or cessation of life-sustaining treatment requested by conscious patients: the Canadian context
- Legal physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in “vulnerable” groups
- Impact of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) on family caregivers
- Legalised euthanasia will violate the rights of vulnerable patients
- Role of non-governmental organisations in physician assisted suicide
- Internists’ attitudes towards terminal sedation in end of life care
- US sees first legal case of physician assisted suicide
- Medical Assistance in Dying at a paediatric hospital