Article Text
Abstract
The practice of evidence based medicine has changed the role of the physician from information dispenser to gatherer and analyser. Studies and controlled trials that may contain unknown errors, or uncertainties, are the primary sources for evidence based decisions in medicine. These sources may be corrupted by a number of means, such as inaccurate statistical analysis, statistical manipulation, population bias, or relevance to the patient in question. Regardless of whether any of these inaccuracies are apparent, the uncertainty of their presence in physician information should be disclosed to the patient. These uncertainties are not, however, shared by physicians with patients, and have caused a direct increase in patient responsibilities and mistrust. Only when disclosure of uncertainty becomes commonplace in medical practice will the physician/patient relationship evolve to a level of greater understanding and satisfaction for both the physician and patient.
- EBM, evidence based medicine
- uncertainty
- evidence based medicine
- physician/patient relationship
- patient responsibility
- internet
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Physician spending and subsequent risk of malpractice claims: observational study
- Patient-initiated second medical consultations—patient characteristics and motivating factors, impact on care and satisfaction: a systematic review
- Analysis of 23 364 patient-generated, physician-reviewed malpractice claims from a non-tort, blame-free, national patient insurance system: lessons learned from Sweden
- Medical school attended as a predictor of medical malpractice claims
- Physicians with multiple patient complaints: ending our silence
- Measuring patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk
- Understanding the role of physician attire on patient perceptions: a systematic review of the literature— targeting attire to improve likelihood of rapport (TAILOR) investigators
- What do our patients understand about their trial participation? Assessing patients' understanding of their informed consent consultation about randomised clinical trials
- Retrospective analysis of medical malpractice claims in tertiary hospitals of China: the view from patient safety
- Symptom evaluation in reflux disease: workshop background, processes, terminology, recommendations, and discussion outputs