Article Text
Abstract
Aim: To improve clinical and ethical understanding of patient preferences for information and involvement in decision making.
Objectives: To develop and evaluate a clinical tool to elicit these preferences and to consider the ethical issues raised.
Design: A before and after study.
Setting: Three UK hospices.
Participants: Patients with advanced life-threatening illnesses and their doctors.
Intervention: Questionnaire on information and decision-making preferences.
Main outcome measures: Patient-based outcome measures were satisfaction with the amount of information given, with the way information was given, with family or carer information, and confidence about future decision making. Doctor-based outcome measures were confidence in matching information to patient preference, matching family or carer communication to patient preference, knowing patient preferences and matching future decision making with patient preference.
Results: Of 336 admissions, 101 patients (mean age 67.3 years, 47.5% men) completed the study (control, n = 40; intervention, n = 61). Patient satisfaction with the way information was given (χ2 = 6.38, df = 2, p = 0.041) and family communication (χ2 = 14.65, df = 2, p<0.001) improved after introduction of the tool. Doctor confidence improved across all outcome measures (all p values<0.001).
Conclusions: Patient satisfaction and doctor confidence were improved by administering the questionnaire, but complex ethical issues were raised by implementing and applying this research. The balance of ethical considerations were changed by advanced life-threatening illness, because there is increased risk of harm through delivery of information discordant with the patient’s own preferences. The importance of truly understanding patient preferences towards the end of life is highlighted by this study.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Making patient values visible in healthcare: a systematic review of tools to assess patient treatment priorities and preferences in the context of multimorbidity
- Increasing inpatient hospice use versus patient preferences in the USA: are patients able to die in the setting of their choice
- Eliciting patient preferences, priorities and trade - offs for outcomes following kidney transplantation: a pilot best – worst scaling survey
- Are patients afraid to go home? Disposition preferences after transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke
- Understanding patients ' preferences for treatment: the need for innovative methodologies
- What matters most to patients when choosing treatment for mild – moderate asthma? Results from a discrete choice experiment
- What publicly available quality metrics do hip and knee arthroplasty patients care about most when selecting a hospital in Maryland: a discrete choice experiment
- Maintenance inhaler therapy preferences of patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a discrete choice experiment
- Understanding patient preference for physician attire in ambulatory clinics: a cross-sectional observational study
- Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools