Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Evaluation and ethical review of a tool to explore patient preferences for information and involvement in decision making
- Correspondence to: Fliss Murtagh Department of Palliative Care and Policy, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, London SE5 9RJ, UK; fliss1{at}doctors.org.uk
Citation
Evaluation and ethical review of a tool to explore patient preferences for information and involvement in decision making
Publication history
- Received April 15, 2005
- Accepted July 25, 2005
- Revised July 21, 2005
- First published May 26, 2006.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2006 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools
- Do patients with gastrointestinal cancer want to decide where they have tests and surgery? A questionnaire study of provider choice
- Preferences of acutely ill patients for participation in medical decision-making
- Study protocol for a cohort study of patients with advanced heart failure in Singapore
- Advanced and end of life care: cautionary suggestions
- Characterising doctor-parent communication in counselling for impending preterm delivery
- Preference for shared decision-making among Arabic-speaking people with chronic diseases: a cross-sectional study
- A decision aid to support informed choices about bowel cancer screening among adults with low education: randomised controlled trial
- The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisions—challenges for doctors
- Suffering in deference: a focus group study of older cardiac patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk