Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Why the apparent haste to clone humans?
- Correspondence to: N Cobbe Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Michael Swann Building, King’s Buildings, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, UK; Neville.Cobbe{at}ed.ac.uk
Citation
Why the apparent haste to clone humans?
Publication history
- Received February 21, 2005
- Accepted May 19, 2005
- Revised May 17, 2005
- First published April 28, 2006.
Online issue publication
April 28, 2006
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2006 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Reproductive cloning in humans and therapeutic cloning in primates: is the ethical debate catching up with the recent scientific advances?
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- Current Science of Regenerative Medicine with Stem Cells
- Cell phoney: human cloning after Quintavalle
- Potentiality of embryonic stem cells: an ethical problem even with alternative stem cell sources
- What exactly is an exact copy? And why it matters when trying to ban human reproductive cloning in Australia
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- The significance of induced pluripotent stem cells for basic research and clinical therapy
- Stem cell therapy for myocardial repair
- Embryonic stem cell production through therapeutic cloning has fewer ethical problems than stem cell harvest from surplus IVF embryos