Background: Knowledge about assent or dissent of children to non-therapeutic research is poor.
Objectives: To assess sociodemographic characteristics in healthy children and adolescents who were invited to participate in non-therapeutic research, to evaluate their motives for assent or dissent and their understanding of the information given.
Methods: A total of 1281 healthy children and adolescents six to sixteen years of age were invited to participate in a non-therapeutic study and a questionnaire.
Results: Assenting children were motivated by a desire to help sick children (n = 638, 98%) and to gain experience with participating in a research study (n = 503, 82%). Dissenting children made their decision because of worries about having a blood (n = 193, 46%) or a urine sample (n = 94, 26%) taken or because of worries about a doctor’s examination (n = 136, 33%). Fewer children in the assent group (n = 166, 25%) than in the dissent group (136, 33%) worried about the doctor’s examination (p = 0.01). In the assent and dissent group, 568 (86%) and 343 (85%) children, respectively, said they were able to understand some or all of the written information (p = 0.42), and 650 (97%) and 330 (98%), respectively, were able to understand some or all of the verbal information (p = 0.07).
Conclusions: Sociodemographic characteristics may not influence healthy children’s decision to volunteer for non-therapeutic research. Assenting children have altruistic and educational motives, whereas worries about procedures may cause children to dissent. A great majority of school children and adolescents feel capable of understanding and giving assent or dissent to non-therapeutic research.
- informed consent
- clinical research
- healthy volunteers
- research subjects
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Are positive experiences of children in non-therapeutic research justifiable research benefits?
- Children’s consent and paediatric research: is it appropriate for healthy children to be the decision-makers in clinical research?
- The child's perspective on discomfort during medical research procedures: a descriptive study
- The problem of informed consent in emergency medicine research
- Assessment and management of children aged 1–59 months presenting with wheeze, fast breathing, and/or lower chest indrawing; results of a multicentre descriptive study in Pakistan
- Non-therapeutic research with minors: how do chairpersons of German research ethics committees decide?
- Ethics in studies on children and environmental health
- Why do parents enrol their children in research: a narrative synthesis
- Paediatric HIV infection
- Little in Norway: a prospective longitudinal community-based cohort from pregnancy to child age 18 months