Guidelines around the world require children to provide assent for their participation in most research studies. Yet, little further guidance is provided on how review committees should implement this requirement, including which children are capable of providing assent and when the requirement for assent may be waived on the grounds that the research offers participating children the potential for important clinical benefit. The present paper argues that the assent requirement is supported by the importance of allowing children who are capable to make their own decisions. This suggests children are capable of assent when they become able to understand the research in question. While development varies across individual children, existing data suggest most children develop this ability by approximately age 14. Until instruments are developed to assess the assent capacity of individual children, this age should be used as the threshold for assent. In addition, the importance of protecting children from harm suggests that the sustained dissent of all children, including those who are unable to provide assent, should be respected. While the assent requirement may be waived when research participation offers the potential for important medical benefit that is unavailable outside the research context, analysis suggests that children’s sustained dissent should be respected in all cases.
- CIOMS, Council for International Organisations of Medical Science
- FDA, Food and Drug Administration
- paediatric research
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Is best interests a relevant decision making standard for enrolling non-capacitated subjects into clinical research?
- Assessing research risks systematically: the net risks test
- To stop or not to stop: dissent and undue burden as reasons to stop participation in paediatric research
- Reification and assent in research involving those who lack capacity
- Prisoners as research participants: current practice and attitudes in the UK
- Uninformed refusals: objections to enrolment in clinical trials conducted under an Exception from Informed Consent for emergency research
- The potential benefit of the placebo effect in sham-controlled trials: implications for risk-benefit assessments and informed consent
- Limits to research risks
- Split views among parents regarding children’s right to decide about participation in research: a questionnaire survey
- Assent as an ethical imperative in the treatment of ADHD