Article info
PDFLaw, ethics, and medicine
Framing euthanasia
- Correspondence to: J P Bishop. Peninsula Medical School Knowledge Spa, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro TR1 3HD, UK; jeffrey.bishop{at}pms.ac.uk
Citation
Framing euthanasia
Publication history
- Received August 1, 2005
- Accepted September 9, 2005
- Revised September 8, 2005
- First published March 30, 2006.
Online issue publication
March 30, 2006
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2006 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Euthanasia, efficiency, and the historical distinction between killing a patient and allowing a patient to die
- The case for physician assisted suicide: how can it possibly be proven
- Legal physician - assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in “ vulnerable ” groups
- The case for physician assisted suicide: not (yet) proven
- Good medical ethics
- When slippery slope arguments miss the mark: a lesson from one against physician - assisted death
- Of dilemmas and tensions: a qualitative study of palliative care physicians ’ positions regarding voluntary active euthanasia in Quebec, Canada
- Young Kuwaitis ' views of the acceptability of physician - assisted suicide
- Australian pharmacists ’ perspectives on physician - assisted suicide (PAS): thematic analysis of semistructured interviews
- Double effect: a useful rule that alone can not justify hastening death