Article info
PDFLaw, ethics, and medicine
Framing euthanasia
- Correspondence to: J P Bishop. Peninsula Medical School Knowledge Spa, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro TR1 3HD, UK; jeffrey.bishop{at}pms.ac.uk
Citation
Framing euthanasia
Publication history
- Received August 1, 2005
- Accepted September 9, 2005
- Revised September 8, 2005
- First published March 30, 2006.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2006 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Euthanasia, efficiency, and the historical distinction between killing a patient and allowing a patient to die
- Legal physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in “vulnerable” groups
- The case for physician assisted suicide: how can it possibly be proven?
- End of life decisions: attitudes of Finnish physicians
- The acceptability of ending a patient’s life
- Physicians’ confidence in discussing do not resuscitate orders with patients and surrogates
- Honouring patient's resuscitation wishes: a multiphased effort to improve identification and documentation
- Do Not Resuscitate orders and ethical decisions in a neonatal intensive care unit in a Muslim community
- The do-not-resuscitate order: associations with advance directives, physician specialty and documentation of discussion 15 years after the Patient Self-Determination Act
- When slippery slope arguments miss the mark: a lesson from one against physician-assisted death