Article Text
Abstract
Raanan Gillon is a noted defender of the four principles approach to healthcare ethics. His general position has always been that these principles are to be considered to be both universal and prima facie in nature. In recent work, however, he has made two claims that seem to present difficulties for this view. His first claim is that one of these four principles, respect for autonomy, has a special position in relation to the others: he holds that it is first among equals. We argue that this claim makes little sense if the principles are to retain their prima facie nature. His second claim is that cultural variation can play an independent normative role in the construction of our moral judgments. This, he argues, enables us to occupy a middle ground between what he sees as the twin pitfalls of moral relativism and (what he calls) moral imperialism. We argue that there is no such middle ground, and while Gillon ultimately seems committed to relativism, it is some form of moral imperialism (in the form of moral objectivism) that will provide the only satisfactory construal of the four principles as prima facie universal moral principles.
- four principles
- autonomy
- Gillon
- moral objectivity
- tolerance
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Ethics needs principles — four can encompass the rest — and respect for autonomy should be “ first among equals ”
- Defending the four principles approach as a good basis for good medical practice and therefore for good medical ethics
- Bioethics and multiculturalism: nuancing the discussion
- The bioethical principles and Confucius ’ moral philosophy
- Medical ethics for children: applying the four principles to paediatrics
- When four principles are too many: a commentary
- Judgement and the role of the metaphysics of values in medical ethics
- The problem of ‘ thick in status, thin in content ’ in Beauchamp and Childress ' principlism
- Juggling law, ethics, and intuition: practical answers to awkward questions
- Sweetening the scent: commentary on “ What principlism misses ”