Anxieties about the creation and destruction of human embryos for the purpose of scientific research on embryonic stem cells have given a new urgency to the question of whether embryos have moral rights. This article uses a thought experiment involving two possible worlds, somewhat removed from our own in the space of possibilities, to shed light on whether early embryos have such rights as a right not to be destroyed or discarded (a “right to life”). It is argued that early embryos do not have meaningful interests or any moral rights. Accordingly, claims about the moral rights of embryos do not justify restrictions on stem cell research.
- ethical theory
- embryo research
- right to life
- stem cells
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- Why two arguments from probability fail and one argument from Thomson’s analogy of the violinist succeeds in justifying embryo destruction in some situations
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate
- Critical notice—Defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choice by Francis J Beckwith
- Is there a ‘new ethics of abortion’?
- The human embryo in the Christian tradition: a reconsideration
- Human embryonic stem cell research debates: a Confucian argument
- Using stem cell-derived gametes for same-sex reproduction: an alternative scenario
- The need for donor consent in mitochondrial replacement
- Potentiality of embryonic stem cells: an ethical problem even with alternative stem cell sources