Article info
PDFControversy
Ethics and opportunity costs: have NICE grasped the ethics of priority setting?
- Correspondence to: J McMillan Department of Philosophy, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK; john.mcmillan{at}hyms.ac.uk
Citation
Ethics and opportunity costs: have NICE grasped the ethics of priority setting?
Publication history
- Received October 26, 2005
- Accepted November 8, 2005
- First published February 28, 2006.
Online issue publication
February 28, 2006
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2006 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence appraisal and ageism
- Not a NICE fallacy: a reply to Dr Quigley
- The use of cost - effectiveness by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE): no (t yet an) exemplar of a deliberative process
- Self inflicted harm — NICE in ethical self destruct mode
- Can a moral reasoning exercise improve response quality to surveys of healthcare priorities
- NICE 's cost effectiveness threshold
- NICE and neurology
- NICE appraisals should be everybody 's business
- It ’s not NICE to discriminate
- Public healthcare resource allocation and the Rule of Rescue