Article info
PDFNeuroethics
Animal rights, animal minds, and human mindreading
- Correspondence to: Dr Matteo Mameli King’s College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1ST, UK; gmm32{at}cam.ac.uk
Citation
Animal rights, animal minds, and human mindreading
Publication history
- Received June 2, 2005
- Accepted August 26, 2005
- First published January 30, 2006.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2006 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Should we enhance animals?
- Genetic disenhancement and xenotransplantation: diminishing pigs’ capacity to experience suffering through genetic engineering
- A Moorean argument for the full moral status of those with profound intellectual disability
- What moral status should be accorded to those human beings who have profound intellectual disabilities? A reply to Curtis and Vehmas
- Moral uncertainty and the farming of human-pig chimeras
- The ethical justification for the use of non-human primates in research: the Weatherall report revisited
- A dualist analysis of abortion: personhood and the concept of self qua experiential subject
- Philosophy, critical thinking and ‘after-birth abortion: why should the baby live?’
- Cyborgs and moral identity
- In critique of anthropocentrism: a more-than-human ethical framework for antimicrobial resistance