Do non-human animals have rights? The answer to this question depends on whether animals have morally relevant mental properties. Mindreading is the human activity of ascribing mental states to other organisms. Current knowledge about the evolution and cognitive structure of mindreading indicates that human ascriptions of mental states to non-human animals are very inaccurate. The accuracy of human mindreading can be improved with the help of scientific studies of animal minds. However, the scientific studies do not by themselves solve the problem of how to map psychological similarities (and differences) between humans and animals onto a distinction between morally relevant and morally irrelevant mental properties. The current limitations of human mindreading—whether scientifically aided or not—have practical consequences for the rational justification of claims about which rights (if any) non-human animals should be accorded.
- SAP, scientific animal psychology
- animal rights
- animal cognition
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Should we enhance animals?
- A Moorean argument for the full moral status of those with profound intellectual disability
- What moral status should be accorded to those human beings who have profound intellectual disabilities? A reply to Curtis and Vehmas
- Moral uncertainty and the farming of human-pig chimeras
- The ethical justification for the use of non-human primates in research: the Weatherall report revisited
- A dualist analysis of abortion: personhood and the concept of self qua experiential subject
- Philosophy, critical thinking and ‘after-birth abortion: why should the baby live?’
- Cyborgs and moral identity
- In critique of anthropocentrism: a more-than-human ethical framework for antimicrobial resistance
- What can neuroscience contribute to ethics?